Blog powered by TypePad

« September 2007 | Main | November 2007 »

October 2007

October 31, 2007

Two Truly Morbid Costume Ideas

Even though I don't like to dress in costume for Halloween, I do like to think about potential costume ideas. These two just came to me, and since I've already committed to getting nothing done at work today, I thought I'd share.

1.) Fashion yourself a fat suit by stuffing cotton into your clothing. Paint face to look dead. Congratulations, you are now morbidly obese.

2.) If you're a woman you can dress up in 1950's attire, carry a journal, and fashion an oven for yourself made out of cardboard. Stick said oven over your head, leave the door area open to serve as the window where your face will stick out. If anyone asks, you are Sylvia Plath.

Apologies to any readers who are either morbidly obese or rabid Sylvia Plath fans.

Happy Slut-O-Ween

I have to go to a Halloween party later, which I am not particularly looking forward to, mainly because I am a complete scrooge when it comes to the holiday. I simply find the whole practice of adults dressing in costume to be more than a little absurd. Yes, judge away.

At said party will be a person who has taken it upon himself to tell other people some not particularly true or nice things about me. I guess he thinks that word wouldn't get back to me but it has. I frequently run into this person and whenever I do he is perfectly pleasant towards me, a situation that I now find hilarious due to the whole duplicitous junior highish nature of our current relationship. My only real plan for the day is what I intend to say to him when I see him later: "That's a scary mask." And I pray to god he isn't actually wearing one or else my line won't be nearly as funny or as scathing.

October 24, 2007

New England All the Way/Tipping @ Political Windmills

My home states (where I was born and moved back and forth between as a child) are featuring prominently in my mind these days. Not only are the Red Sox going to the World Series again, but after extensive careful consideration, I have decided to support Chris Dodd for president.

Laugh all you want, you Yankees fans and Hillary/Obama  supporters.

While the reasons to love the Red Sox are so obvious I'm not even going to bother going over them, those to love Dodd aren't quite as transparent. But here is why I do. Apart from being very liberal, I agree with his stances on various social issues, like that he spent time in the Peace Corps, and personally believe that he rocks some pretty beautiful eyebrows. Obviously not a factor in regards to his foreign policy prowess, but they make for some nice eye candy when cruising his website.

Now I know what many of you are saying. Dodd is a liberal Senator from New England who has been in Washington for 30 years and is thus totally "unelectable." That might very well be true. On the other hand, our other choices this cycle include a woman, a black guy and a Mormon. Furthermore, if more people let their idealism guide their voting choices rather than their jaded sense of practicality we might actually elect some interesting candidates. Certainly ones that are better than the loser we currently have in office. While pragmatism is an honorable trait, and I respect  the choices of those who are supporting Hillary or Obama because they believe they can win, I also think that part of the beauty of the American political system is the fact that we have so many choices and a rather efficient primary system to narrow down the field. While I would love to live in a world where Dodd becomes the Democratic candidate and manages to recruit the support of enough swing voters to actually win without looking like a "flip flopper" I doubt that will happen. But that doesn't mean I can't articulate my support for him and what he stands for by backing him for as long as he remains in the race. If more people followed that logic, those candidates that are considered unelectable might prove to be anything but.

In the comments section tell me who your candidate is. Your true candidate, not the one you're supporting because you think they've got what it takes to win.

October 18, 2007

Dating A Seven Year-Old (Indirectly) A Semi-Rant by HP

Prominent within the list of common "deal breakers" that single people often cobble together when outlining the attributes of their perfect mate, are children. More specifically, many singletons will rule out a person with a child as a possible romantic potential. Since earlier in the year I decided to do away with my "deal breaker" list altogether, the fact that Agent 47 has a young daughter wasn't something that I was going to hold against him. For the first couple of months that we dated, the child was a non-issue because she was in Europe with her mother for the summer. Hence, we were free to hangout whenever we wanted, and we got into the habit of spending whole weekends together. I knew that period was a "honeymoon" phase in many ways, but I had no idea how difficult it would be to juggle schedules once the ex and the kid returned to town.

Agent 47 and the ex have an every-other-weekend agreement where they alternate weekends for caring for the child. At least they do in theory. In reality, there are many weekends when she'll come up with a reason as to why he has to take care of the kid. This often happens at the very last minute and as a result, it can be difficult to make weekend plans with him. And since he lives in fear of pissing her off, he would never in a million years dream of doing the same to her. The result: she tends to spend a disproportionate amount of time out on the town with her friends at various trashy bars.

I'm the sort of person who likes to know what they're doing several days in advance. I know that in this current era of cell phones and instant messages, this makes me a hopeless throwback to a more rigid time. But I simply don't see what is wrong with making a plan and committing to it. Because of this, I hate making tentative plans. I think it's rude to tell somebody that you "might" want to hang out with them. So on weekends when I know that the ex is technically in charge of the kid, I get really excited and start looking forward to all the awesome romantic dates I can squeeze into one weekend with Agent 47 knowing that if I get to see him at all in the coming two weeks, it will probably only be a weekend night here and there and only for a couple of hours at that. Also on those weekends, I tend to not make plans with my other friends. This causes me to miss out on a good deal of platonic "quality time" and it makes me that girl who blows off her friends for her boyfriend. Once you become that girl you tend to find that you lose all your friends altogether, and with the chaotic transitions my social life has taken this year, I simply can't deal with losing anyone else.

The short story of it is that I'm starting to feel as if a seven year old is running my social life, and I'm starting to empathize with people who list "children" as deal breakers. We're not really at a phase in our relationship where 47 is going to introduce me to his daughter, and his ex is so worked up about him seeing me that she'd probably come after me with a shiv if she knew I was polluting her child's life with my presence. This is not to say that I'm about to kick 47 to the curb, but my appreciation for the non-child set is growing by leaps and bounds. In writing this I by no means want to offend my readers who are parents, by the way. I'm simply presenting my particular story from my particular angle. Perhaps there are others of you out there whose situations are less complicated.

Anyway. I'll probably be seeing some of you at tomorrow's HH. I need some activity this weekend that is mine, so if 47 wants to hang out with me, he'll just have to wait for me as I do for him.

October 15, 2007

Lily Tomlin Is My Co-Pilot

So earlier today, when 47 and I were communicating about my most recent meltdown he referenced the Lily Tomlin quote "Things Will Get Worse Before They Get Worse." He was actually quoting Elizabeth Gilbert quoting Lily Tomlin. Per my advice, he's been reading Eat, Pray, Love, which is about Gilbert's spiritual and literal journeys following her own divorce. I knew he'd love the book, but now I fear that he's taking it to heart a bit too literally. The last thing I need now is for him to up and move abroad for a year while he "finds himself." I mean, that would probably be great for him, but horrible for me. Me, me, me. I know. It's getting old. Anyhoo.

I was then inspired to find another Tomlin quote to counter his and I came across the best possible one I could find. Really, the Universe was totally on my side at that moment. What I found was this:

Forgiveness means giving up all hope for a better past.

Isn't that so beautiful and true? Really, all you can ever do is realize that what's done is done and that you can't change what has already happened, simply accept and move on. He agreed and has been using it all day.

I've loved Tomlin for as long as I can remember. As a young child I adored her as Edith Anne, and even as an adult I find that whenever I get stuck sitting in a chair that prevents my feet from touching the ground (which happens from time to time, as I am on the small side), that I always remark that I feel like Edith Anne. Most people don't get reference.

Regardless, I have always felt a certain spiritual affinity with her, and this moment basically solidified that.  Lily Tomlin is my religion.

Finding Faith/Alone Together

So...I've decided to take this post down. The particular "crisis" that it charted is completely over, or never really even existed in the first place. Talking was done; conversation was had. The relationship has been conjugated: I'm fine; he's fine' we're fine.

While the post was useful for a couple of days, I am a firm believer in every blogger's right to remove from the internet what is no longer relevant.

Lesson of the week: never jump to rash conclusions and learn how to have some damn faith in the people you love.

Damn, I am such a drama queen. 

October 11, 2007

That Black Hole In the Universe Otherwise Known as My Sock Drawer

As promised, I conduced a thorough investigation earlier this week into the distressed state of my sock drawer. The results were grim. It seems that I own upwards of two dozen orphaned socks. Where their mates have run off to, I have no idea. But I am developing some theories.

The first is that my dryer is connected to a black hole in the universe that has a particular taste for cozy, stretchy pieces of fabric designed to cover one's foot. I have long maintained the position that that if Heaven exists as a physical place, it is also where people are reunited with lost possessions. Should I ever have the privilege of ending up there, I expect to find quite a number of earring backings, lens caps, pens, winter hats and house keys. We can now add socks to that ever growing list of lost and found objects.

My second theory is based on the South Park episode Gnomes, where an underground army of gnomes sneak into Tweek's bedroom every night and abscond with his underpants. If memory serves it was never clear what the motivation for their endeavor was other than to sell them for profit. The Marxist scholar in me has always loved this episode as a metaphor for the mysterious workings of capitalism and its sometimes devastating effects. Whenever I find another orphaned sock, I can't help but remember that episode and blame my problem on the sock gnomes. Somewhere in DC a cottage industry of sock puppets is no doubt thriving, thanks in part to the fruits of my sock drawer. If this indeed the case I expect some sort of kickback.

October 09, 2007

The Domestic

I seem to own several dozen socks, few of which seem match one another. Or they might if they weren't scattered in various dresser drawers, under my bed and in my hamper. I know I should just roll them into pairs when they're fresh from the wash, but that would ruin the fun of frantically digging through my clean clothes basket every morning searching for two that look alike. Or even like cousins if my pants are long enough. I'm clearly no time-efficiency expert but I bet if you were to count, you'd be able to tell me that I lose x number of days a year as a result of the distressed condition of my sock-organization system. Scratch that--complete lack of sock organization system.

Hence the need for the sock project wherein I will dig through every drawer and under every piece of furniture that might possibly be harboring a fugitive sock and attempt to reunite each one with its intended mate. No progressive marital or divorce laws will be acknowledged as a part of this endeavor. While in real life I support the rights of heterogeneous racial pairings, along with homogeneous gender ones, I must insist on going Pat Robertson on these socks. Grey HUE trouser socks are only meant to be paired with other grey Hue trouser socks. Ditto for those expensive white running socks with the built in arch supports. It is possible that exceptions will be made in the case of 12 year old argyles from the Gap as I only ever wear those to the gym anyway, and I suspect that I have several widowers on my hands with these guys. Far be it from me to force the blue argyle to spend its golden years all alone if it can be happy with an equally grieving beige and brown argyle.

But among the others I must insist on being a traditionalist in the strictest sense of the term.

Even scarier than the fact that I just managed to use socks to create a metaphor for inter-racial and same-sex marriage is that I am totally looking forward to this. Earlier, when 47 asked what I was doing tonight, I related my plan to him with the same sort of glee I used to reserve for pounding whisky shots and flirting with random boys in bars. Somewhere along the way, when I wasn't looking, I became a domestic. My plan for the night includes yoga and matching socks, and somehow that feels just right. If I really feel like mixing it up, I may also knit a scarf.

October 08, 2007

The New Boy Comes Home to Nest

G is nesting. My third floor roommate since last Thursday when the previous tenant moved out to shack up with his girlfriend in Brooklyn. Whereas my former roommate lived sparely, at 24 not quite old enough to have amassed the number of possessions that weigh down and encumber so many of us just a few years old, G's stuff trails out from the door of his room and snakes its way around the perimeter of the hallway that separates our individual living spaces.

I have lived in this house for three years now. Despite popular custom, I have declined opportunities to "upgrade" to the second floor bedroom that has its own bathroom, preferring to remain settled in my own quiet corner of the house in the room that is actually two rooms, consisting of a modestly-sized bedroom and a separate space about half the size that I have painted a shade of green called "tea" and decorated with old battered furniture, most of it cast-aways from former roommates. Some people strive to live lives unfettered by the accumulation of random possessions should they suddenly feel compelled to up and move to Bali or some other exotic location. Or at the very least they live as such simply to maintain the ability to do so, even if pragmatism would ultimately prevent them from committing such a daring feat of relocation. I am not one of those people.

I take comfort in my innate ability to grow roots. I bristle at the idea of perpetual motion. When I arrive in a location that I like, be it a neighborhood bar on a Friday night, a city to live in, or even the sofa in our den on a wintry Sunday afternoon, I set up shop and do not move. Some people save their money and dream of spending it on roaming the globe in search of transcendence on foreign beaches. I save mine and dream of the sofa I will buy when I can finally afford a one-bedroom apartment of my very own in a neighborhood I adore. Not because I am so shallow or materialistic that I base my happiness on the accumulation of possessions, but because my happiness is based on my ability to create my own sacred spaces.

I am a nester. I accumulate things. Old magazines, antique jewelry, art, books, porcelain boxes, quilts made from hand by my mother. In surrounding myself with objects of varying degrees of beauty and meaning, I feel more anchored and settled. More content in my skin and with the choices I have made. At times I wonder what would happen if I were faced with a cataclysmic life event such as a fire or a robbery and all of my possession were snatched out from underneath me. Would it compromise my sense of security and self? Or would being liberated from hundreds of pounds of literature and fine art provide some sort of catharsis I am currently preventing myself from experiencing? It's a situation I hope to never encounter.

Until G moved in last week I had never met a male nester before. Most of my male friends and past boyfriends have displayed a marked indifference to their domestic possessions. One in particular was so adverse to the possibility of being hampered by his possessions that he made a point of discarding all of his furniture every time he moved, even if it was within the range of only several zip codes.

I remember vividly the sense of hurt and betrayal my mother articulated when she separated from my father. Not because the marriage was ending but because he expressed no desire to equally split up their shared possessions. To my mother the antique highboy in the foyer of their Noe Valley condo was a symbol of years of domestic solidarity. 20+ years of shared history, raising a child, weathering various personal crisis's. He saw it differently and exited the marriage keeping only a framed water color painted by an old family friend some 30 years earlier. Where my mother collected antiques, old quilts, the occasional sterling tea service and decorated her homes to look as if there were inhabited by old money bohemians, my father's first apartment as a single man was modeled in a purely reactionary vein. Brand new Japanese furniture sets, a Miro lithograph, vases containing a single orchid on the occasional black lacquered surface. An articulation of independence or a fresh new start.

With G's arrival in our house the topography of our shared floor has gradually changed with the addition of new objects in public spaces. Early Saturday morning I stumbled into our shared bathroom for a glass of water to find my feet cushioned by bathmats where before I had only encountered a hard, cold surface. The window ledge, formally host to my sprawling collection of high-end lip glosses, mascaras, makeup brushes and hair products is now cluttered with a dozen or so new toiletries of the male variety.

Disorganized by nature and indifferent to its potential cures, I have long expressed my presence on the third floor through my sprawl. My possessions are never confined to my own room. I long ago claimed the hallway that divides my space from that of my roommates as my own personal domain. If any of them have really minded none have expressed any indication to that effect. But a new force has been introduced and it is reigning me in.

I certainly don't mind performing a little reshuffling in order to make a new roommate feel at home. I'm adaptable by nature and I empathize with his desire to carve out his own space. I am even impressed with the bravado with which he has done so. On his second day in the house he brought home a can of paint and proceeded to color his walls a masculine yet chic shade of olive-khaki. Painting is frowned upon by our landlord, a fact that some of us clearly disregard. Nesters create their own spaces at the expense of the rules. We'd rather suffer future consequences than be forced to live within walls scuffed by years of neglect or lack of imagination.

Yet just as one adjusts to the preferences of a new love, living with a new roommate presents its own set of required compromises. The hallway closet that I annexed as my own several months ago when it became clear that my old roommate had no use for it had to be sacrificed to make room for G's impressive collection of business-appropriate attire. Its former contents now sit in piles in the hallway awaiting reassignment into storage devices that do not yet exist. I fear that a major purging may be lurking around the next corner.

Sometimes people find the initiative within themselves to enact changes to their surrounding or to their lives as a whole. Other changes are imposed by external forces. The arrival of a new roommate is an example of the later. But sometimes the introduction of a new life force is exactly in order for shaking up the status quo and moving yourself forward. However tiny and incremental the steps.

October 05, 2007

What Not to Wear (on Halloween)

It's that time of year again; many of you are no doubt beginning to contemplate potential Halloween costumes. Although I had once thought that dressing up for Halloween becomes somewhat gauche after the 9th grade, I have apparently been proven wrong by the throngs of parties I have encountered in DC over the years to celebrate this most special of days. To be honest, I mostly think that the only people out there who have a claim on Halloween are individuals under the age of 13 and pagans. But since expressing this opinion generally brands me a social non-entity, in recent years I have learned to shut up and play along with the whole game. When it comes to Halloween costumes, I am of the mind that clever and simple is best. Costumes that involve a ton of advance preparation tend to fall flat because most people don't have the time or intellectual energy to properly devote to constructing a killer ensemble. Procrastination is public enemy #1 when it comes to costume planning. So if you haven't already started building your Great Wall of China costume, I'm sad to tell you that the clock has probably run out on that particular flash of brilliance, and you  may be better served by shelving the idea for next year.

What bugs me the most about Halloween is the tendency of females to use the occasion to dress as complete slut. Yes, I have been guilty of this on more than one occasion. Looking back on the ensembles I attempted to pull off on Halloween during the years of self-discovery that I like to call my mid-20's makes me wince in embarrassment. Sure, there was something delightfully Cindy Sherman-esque about the year I dressed as "The Morning After", but as 47 put it to me the other day why should I surprised that half the people I know think I'm a complete freak? Point well taken. Likewise, "Freudian Slip" was delightful in its misguided wit but really all it earned me was a one-night stand with a guy who later proved to be a complete douche-bag.

Sure, the early part of our decade was an era of emboldened post-feminist displays of skin and sexual bravado, symbolized by the unparalleled popularity of then pop-star Brittney Spears in all her low-riding denim glory. But it doesn't take an editor of Jezebel to note La Brit's subsequent fall from grace, nor does it take a feminist scholar to posit that maybe her transition to pop culture road kill may very well symbolize an end of an era. In other words, the whole coquettishly vixeneque thing is a little played out. If I see one more costume that applies the words sexy or slutty to a random noun I will stab myself on the eye with a lit cigarette. Sexy/slutty school girls, nurses, policewomen, nuns, school teachers, librarians, cats, [fill in the blank] are ridiculously played out. I understand that DC is the city of sartorially repressed policy geeks and that Halloween is their one opportunity of the year to let their freak flags fly, but the whole endeavor is pathetically played out. If you're going to play the sexy/slutty____ card, at the very least do it at a sex party or be a bit tongue-in-cheek about it. Sexy/slutty prostitute anyone?

Moreover, in my experience I have found that the more prudish, uptight and judgmental the girl in real life, the more undeeply sexual the costume. I can't count the number of parties I've been to in my day where I've witnessed the obligatory clique of Mean Girls clad in the slutty_____ outfits gossiping over the Natty-Bo keg about that chick so-and-so who supposedly did whatever with guy x. The irony of a bunch of ladies committing verbal assault on another women for doing in real life what their rented images suggested that they do as well was painfully obvious. Look the part, but don't act it. How very progressive.

So on that note, why not mix it up a bit this year? Why not dare to swathe yourself in layers of cozy warm clothing. Bring back Grunge. Dress as a guy. Be original. Identify the predominant news trends of the past 6 months. Now ignore all of them because I will bet you a whole bag of candy corn that dozens of people in DC are going as love-lorn astronauts in adult diapers, horny Senators, and Jenna Bush. Look beyond your immediate context and past the obvious.

Abstract concepts and plays on words are often a good starting point, just be careful not to get too obscure, cerebral or hokey. "Cereal Killer" has been done a few too many times, so step away from that box of Lucky Charms. In my opinion, the best humor plays cleverly with context. It may look hilarious to pair a clown wig with kabuki makeup and a mechanics uniform but what's your point? Completely random often just equates to slapdash and weird. You can do better.

Above all remember that unless you're a pagan it's a meaningless, empty holiday with little at stake. If you find yourself stressing out about your costume, you're in too deep. In that case, cut two holes out of a sheet, throw it over your head and go as a ghost. If any costume Nazis tell you your ensemble is lame, tell 'em to lighten up.